We all have warm
glossy associations with certain emotional touchstones. Most adults remember when our national self-image
was pretty much summed up by thoughts of Mom and apple pie, along with some caring
school teachers. There are war stories about
soldiers who credited focusing on these memories with sustaining them during
prolonged adversity. No one would have denigrated
these symbols of American life.
Yet some high
profile leaders, in their relentless pursuit of change, have forgotten how
important these basic concepts can be to people. And the unexpected criticism of mothers,
apple pie, and teachers has led to a push back of growing dimensions. Consider the following:
Criticizing
Moms and Teachers
Secretary of
Education Arne Duncan chose to belittle mothers for their lack of support for
new standards saying, “It’s
fascinating to me that some of the pushback is coming from, sort of, white
suburban moms who — all of a sudden — their child isn’t as brilliant as they thought
they were and their school isn’t quite as good as they thought they were, and
that’s pretty scary.” Mothers did not take well
to having their concerns about standardized tests being shrugged off with a
glib assertion that they were overly protective and had exaggerated assumptions
about their children’s intelligence. In
the commentary on Duncan’s statement, it was repeatedly pointed out that had he
said this about any other racial group there would have been screaming
outrage.
In
another similar instance of disparaging the source of criticism, NYS Education Commissioner
John King, after a public forum that dissolved into yelling, cancelled upcoming
public forums with the statement, “In light of the clear intention of
these special interest groups to continue to manipulate the forum, the
PTA-sponsored events scheduled have been suspended.” Unfortunately the audience was made up of
parents and teachers, albeit angry ones, but parents and teachers nevertheless. Neither group took well to being accused of
being a special interest group, with the implication that their specific
concern was not worth hearing. The
outcry was heard around the state and the Commissioner soon scheduled another
series of public meetings, but the damage to his image among the insulted
groups had been done.
One result of this damage was visible in April at the annual
meeting of New York’s statewide teachers’ union, NYSUT. NYSUT members voted “No Confidence” in the
Commissioner. This unprecedented “No Confidence” vote was a statement of profound
philosophical disagreement with the Commissioner on how education should be
led. After the teachers voted, a spokesman
for the Commissioner dismissed NYSUT’s action as “politics.” But what can be gained by choosing to ignore
a deeply held concern of a group representing 600,000 people who are
professionals in his field?
Imposing new
standards
Regardless of
one’s view of the value of the Common Core Learning Standards, where their
introduction has been characterized by top-down imposition on teachers and
students with no opportunity for parents and education professionals to have a voice
in the changes in their schools, there has been push back. Many social media sites support the positions
of unhappy parents and educators.
The growing opposition
to the Common Core manifests itself in a variety of ways – locally by parents
opting their children out of state tests, and statewide by involving political
leaders in issues that were previously left to state boards of education.
In response to
public anger, Indiana has terminated its involvement with the Common Core Learning
Standards and North Carolina is currently considering a similar action. Here in New York, changes to the planned
implementation for the use of data from state tests were included in the state
budget document, and other proposed laws intervene with the roll-out of teacher
evaluation and certification requirements.
New York State’s new budget, in response to public outcry, terminated the State Education Department’s plan to put student data in a cloud-based data base called inBloom. The state’s Race to the Top grant application committed New York to creating a data base that would carry all information about student and teacher performance. The stated goal was to collect data in a way that would improve instruction. The goal was quite sweeping as Arne Duncan described it in a speech in June 2009, “Hopefully, someday, we can track children from preschool to high school and from high school to college and college to career."
New York State’s new budget, in response to public outcry, terminated the State Education Department’s plan to put student data in a cloud-based data base called inBloom. The state’s Race to the Top grant application committed New York to creating a data base that would carry all information about student and teacher performance. The stated goal was to collect data in a way that would improve instruction. The goal was quite sweeping as Arne Duncan described it in a speech in June 2009, “Hopefully, someday, we can track children from preschool to high school and from high school to college and college to career."
Parents recoiled at the idea of their children’s personal
information –hundreds of data points including grades, discipline records, family
issues, health, and economic data – being stored in a giant multi-state cloud-based
data base. Motivated by a lack of
confidence in the absolute security of such a cloud, the push-back against it
became an irresistible force and the state legislature passed legislation
withdrawing from inBloom. New York
became the final state to separate from inBloom and the data base is closing down.
Apple Pie
And as for the
apple pie, because of strict new federal nutrition standards, pie has become something
you won’t find in school lunches because it is does not fit into the
constraints of the nutritional allowances. The considerable outcry about limits on portions
and menu items has resulted in Congress and the Department of Agriculture
backtracking on their overly strict guidance.
There are also current bills before Congress modifying the federal role
in limiting food choices and returning those decisions to local districts.
Caution to the leader who thinks he can ignore the voice of
the people. Leadership is about leading,
about motivating people to embrace ideas and actions, and it requires trust. Being appointed or elected to an office may
give a person a title but it does not make them a true leader. This is something people in leadership
positions might want to ponder.